Welcome to

Main Menu

· Home
· Syndicate (rss, etc.)

· News
· Sections
· Topics
· Reviews
· Forums Archives
· Forums

· AvantGo
· Stats
· Members List
· Recommend Us
· Top List
· Web Links
· FAQ
· Search
· Vote for Victor Marks

Who's Online

We have 14 guests and 0 members online

Welcome Guest, become a member today.


Languages

Select interface language:


Farewell, Mr. Reagan
_POSTEDON Jun 07, 2004 - 05:34 PM
Opinions and EditorialsDear friends,

On this day, we said good-bye to one of our greatest Presidents. I admit I'm a bit younger than most of you, so my recollection of him in office is limited to smaller things like jellybeans, his forcefulness in response to foreign threats, and his warmth to whomever he was speaking. I also remember September 1985, when I was fortunate enough to hold hands with his wife Nancy as we marched the old Capitol grounds, I wearing my green "Just Say No" t-shirt for the occasion.

As I try and put the passing of Mr. Reagan (the second President serving in my lifetime that I was aware of in any real sense, and the first one I knew enough about to know I liked him) into perspective, I find myself reading over his old speeches.

I can find none that resonate with me more than the speech he gave on California and the Problem of Government Growth, delivered on January 5, 1967.

" To a number of us, this is a first and hence a solemn and momentous occasion, and yet, on the broad page of state and national history, what is taking place here is almost commonplace routine. We are participating in the orderly transfer of administrative authority by direction of the people. And this is the simple magic which makes a commonplace routine a near miracle to many of the world's inhabitants: the continuing fact that the people, by democratic process, can delegate this power, yet retain custody of it.

---- READ ON ----


Perhaps you and I have lived with this miracle too long to be properly appreciative. Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction, It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again. Knowing this, it is hard to explain those who even today would question the people's capacity for self-rule. Will they answer this: if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? Using the temporary authority granted by the people, an increasing number lately have sought to control the means of production, as if this could be done without eventually controlling those who produce. Always this is explained as necessary to the people's welfare. But, "The deterioration of every government begins with the decay of the principle upon which it was founded" [Montesquieu]. This is as true today as it was when it was written in 1748.

Government is the people's business, and every man, woman and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid. With all the profound wording of the Constitution, probably the most meaningful words are the first three: "We, the People." Those of us here today who have been elected to constitutional office or legislative position are in that three-word phrase. We are of the people, chosen by them to see that no permanent structure of government ever encroaches on freedom or assumes a power beyond that freely granted by the people. We stand between the taxpayer and the taxspender.

It is inconceivable to me that anyone could accept this delegated authority without asking God's help. I pray that we who legislate and administer will be granted wisdom and strength beyond our own limited power; that with Divine guidance we can avoid easy expedients, as we work to build a state where liberty under law and justice can triumph, where compassion can govern, and wherein the people can participate and prosper because of their government and not in spite of it."

Thank you for letting me share my thoughts, and God bless you.

June 5 2004

 
Other Stories

· So if it isn't desperation, what is it? (Sep 19, 2004)
· Dispensing with the "root cause, desperation" (Sep 19, 2004)
· Mr.Miller Responds. (Sep 15, 2004)
· Whither the Moderate Muslim? (Sep 08, 2004)
· RNC speeches online (Sep 08, 2004)
· Farewell, Mr. Reagan (Jun 07, 2004)
· Opinions on the French Ban of Religious Symbols (Feb 18, 2004)
· EU funding terror in a proxy war against the US? (Dec 26, 2003)
· Rules of Statesmanship and Warfare (Dec 17, 2003)
· Hussein, Al-Qaeda, and Palestinian Terror (Dec 17, 2003)

Poll

What one issue concerns you most?

· Education
· Rezoning / Assimilation into City Limits
· Government Spending
· Environment
· Healthcare
· Financial Security
· Other (please comment below)

[ Results | Polls ]


Votes: 71
Comments: 196


User's Login

 Username
 Password
 Remember me


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!

Past Articles

Wednesday, December 17
·How do you try Saddam Hussein? (28)
Thursday, October 30
·Coders as Artists (26)
Saturday, June 14
·Alaska Passes Anti-Patriot Act Resolution; Second State to Oppose Feds (46)
·RLC-NC Has Success at State GOP Convention (35)
·Alarmed Republicans, Conservatives Swell ACLU Ranks (44)
Friday, June 06
·Ashcroft wants to extend the powers of PATRIOT (35)
Thursday, June 05
·US out of U.N. - for gun rights! - Ron Paul protects Liberty again (28)
Friday, March 07
·Ashcroft believes he is defending civil liberties - wha? (22)
·What the Internet Really Is. (478)
Wednesday, February 19
·DOT wants to commit surveillance and be exempt from Privacy Act (27)
 Older Articles

Topics

· All Topics
· 2ndamendment (Jun 05, 2003)
· All Topics (Jun 14, 2003)
· campaign (Aug 05, 2002)
· economics (Jul 04, 2002)
· freespeech (Mar 07, 2003)
· libertyboard (Jun 10, 2002)
· news (Jun 14, 2003)
· op-ed (Sep 15, 2004)
· privacy (Feb 19, 2003)
· war (Sep 19, 2004)
· warondrugs (Aug 03, 2002)
· worldevents (Sep 08, 2004)


Theme from THEMES.crossworlds.ru